Olympus Wide Angle Zooms 9-18 vs 7-14 Review Part 3

This is the final part in the series reviewing the Olympus 7-14 and the 9-18.  In Part 1 we reviewed the 9-18mm.  In Part 2 we reviewed the 7-14.  Now we look at these two lenses compared to each other.  Is the (relatively) larger, faster, more expensive lens the better choice to the small, lightweight, lens?  Let’s see.

7-14 vs 9-18

These are non-scientific tests.  I don’t bother with charts, and lines, etc… because my clients don’t buy charts and lines.  They buy photographs.  I don’t put charts and lines on my walls or my albums either.  I am concerned with the end result.  I am most concerned with how a file holds up to my typical usage and editing.  I want to know what my results will be like.  Not some “ideal” and marginal number comparison.  So that is what I am presenting here.  My technique is as such…camera is an E-M1 v1 with an RRS L bracket mounted on a Feisol Elite tripod with no leg extensions open.  It was fully closed for maximum stability.  I use an RRS BH55 ballhead.  Both cameras were set to base ISO of 200.  The Wide open images were set wide open (the 9-18 is variable, so I adjusted speed to keep the same exposure).  The stopped down images were set to F/7.1.  I focused manually to the point just around the leaf in front of the third pavement stone.  I used a 2-second timer and anti-shock 0 mode to ensure the least camera vibration.

This mirrors how I usually set my wide angle scenes.  I typically use hyperfocal distance, or focus on something midway through the scene, set to F/7.1 and use a self timer.  Note close corner focus would be different if I focused closer, or if I used a deeper F-stop.  Again, I shot these how I typically work, so that’s what we see.

You can see settings of each camera ontop of the image in the screen shots.  These are all screen shots out of lightroom.  The crops are 100%.  Feel free to click on the screen shots to open them up large in a new tab.

I also only compared at the widest overlapping and longest overlapping focal lengths.  I wanted to see how these two lenses stack up in an even comparison.  The 7-14 is generally on the left and the 9-18 is generally on the right.  Double check the text to make sure!


9mm Overall Scene
9mm Center Wide Open
9mm Top Left Corner Wide Open


Now the same set stopped down to F/7.1.

9mm Center F/7.1
9mm Top Left Corner F/7.1


The next two are at 14mm stopped down.

14mm Center F/7.1
14mm Top Left Corner F/7.1


Now the same two wide open.

14mm Center Wide Open
14mm Top Left Corner Wide Open


Here is a comparison of another scene between 7mm and 9mm field of view.  There is definitely a difference.  How huge…but it’s there.  You could easily step back another foot and match distance with the 9mm though.

7mm vs 9mm


The previous scene comparing 7mm to 9mm field of view as well.

7mm Vs 9mm


And just for fun, here is a corner crop of 7mm wide open compared to 9mm wide open.  Basically both lenses wide open at their widest focal length.

7mm vs 9mm Top Left Corner Wide Open


Here is an image I shot with the 9-18mm at 9mm.  I also had a ND filter to slow the shutter down.  There is a center crop and a corner crop.

9mm Scene
9mm Center
9mm Corner


Here is a scene from the 7-14mm showing an edge and a corner.

7mm Scene
7mm Left Edge
7mm Corner


This last shot is what impresses me the most.  Look at the corner of the 7-14mm!!!  Not only does it have good definition…it does not have the smearing a lot of wide angles have in the extreme corner.  For being a 7mm lens…this is pretty amazing.

My conclusion is that both lenses hold up against each other very well in the center.  You really don’t give up too much with the 9-18. It is a good lens.  It just doesn’t have as much fine detail rendering.  Very slight, but noticeable.  The corners on the 7-14 are better.  Even with the depth of field advantage that the slower 9-18 has…the corners on the 7-14 wide open are still better in most cases.  The 7-14 did show some purple fringing in highlight edges wide open.  It wasn’t much though, and easily removable in lightroom with a single click.  Both lenses make prints that are excellent.  I’ve printed with both lenses and in most prints below 24 inches, you probably wouldn’t think twice about either one.

If you use High Resolution mode a lot, or print 16 – 30″ prints primarily, I would go for the Pro lens.  The slightly higher fine detail rendering will be appreciated.  If you just use this focal length occasionally, or want an ultra wide in your bag just in case… get the 9-18.  It is more convenient.  And it takes filters.  It will fit into your workflow with other lenses better.  If you do a lot of landscape work or architectural images, I would opt for the 7-14.  The weather sealing is worth it in the field.  The extra field of view lets you get closer and have more to work with in terms of cropping a fake shift or digitally fixing lines.  The 7-14 needs a specialized filter setup though.  Keep that in mind.  I honestly don’t use extreme wide that often.  I think an 8mm Pro prime would have been a good idea.  Something around the size of the fisheye lens but rectilinear.  If I am using an ultra wide…it’s to go ultra wide.  Rarely do I end up zooming these lenses.  Your use may be different.  I know a lot of people that use a 9-18mm as a standard lens, have a middle range prime, and then a telephoto zoom.  It’s a tough decision.  Especially with the price of the 9-18mm being so much more attractive.  I honestly can’t call one a hands down winner over the other in this case.  For landscapes I actually prefer the 9-18 for filter use, and for other work I prefer the 7-14. Which do you prefer?


6 responses on "Olympus Wide Angle Zooms 9-18 vs 7-14 Review Part 3"

  1. Hi Tony,

    very nice site! I appreciate your comparison of these two lenses. Many people just compare against the Panasonic 7-14mm.

    I own the 9-18 already for a long time and bought the 7-14 last year, but returned it after my tests. It is a wonderful low-light or indoor lens, but it produces terrible flares on sunny days. I even had flares at 14mm although the sun wasn’t even in the frame at 7mm. Once the sun is in your back, everything is fine, but that often only produces flat images. And since the difference in sharpness/resolution is only really visible for pixel-peepers, the extra stop and the 7-9mm range weren’t enough arguments for me to keep it.


  2. Tony, very helpful article – thank you.

  3. Excellent article! I’ve been reading wide-angle lense reviews, but this was the first comparison article I found. Definitely makes my selection process easier! Thanks again, keep up the good work!

  4. Tony, so great to see the comparison! Any thoughts about flare? I have the 9-18mm, and I’m having trouble with flare around windows with my interior shots using available light (no flash) and HDR. I was wondering if the 7-14mm controlled flare better under these circumstances? Thanks again!

  5. Thanks Tony for your articles. I really appreciated the way you compared both lens and your pictures in general.
    I have a 9-18mm and hesitate to replace it with the 7-14mm but after reading your review and reviewing the zoom factors I use with my lens, I think I’ll keep it.

Leave a Message

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2018 Unlocking Olympus. All Rights Reserved.